There are two provisions in nearly every commerical contract that I tend to be asked about more than others.  These provisions are:  (1) indemnification clauses; and (2) “forum selection” clauses.  Most manufacturers and distributors are familiar with the first.  Not as many are familiar with the second.

Fundamentally, an indemnification clause is typically designed to provide protection to a party in the event a lawsuit or claim is filed against it by a third party.  For instance, a distribution agreement will typically have an indemnification clause that states that if the distributor is sued by an end user of a product, the distributor can seek indemnification from the manufacturer.  Similarly, a manufacturer may have a supply agreement that states that it can seek indemnification from its suppliers to the extent that the raw materials do not meet certain agreed upon standards.  For that reason, it is important to review these clauses periodically with your legal counsel particularly because these clauses can take on many forms.  For instance, some clauses allow the party that is sued to pick their own legal counsel and also control the litigation while other clauses may not.

The other type of clause that is less known is the “forum selection” clause.  This clause generally is contained at the end of the commerical agreement and may not stand out.  This clause typically addresses a situation wherein two commerical parties have a dispute about a contractual agreement.  A forum selection clause typically answers two questions.  First, will the dispute be resolved in court or through arbitration?  Second, if a lawsuit is filed, where must it be brought (i.e., what state or country in some situations)?  In Connecticut, for instance, the law on forum selection clauses can be confusing, but what is clear is that certain language (a.k.a. “magic words”) often needs to be used for these clauses to acheive their purpose.  For that reason, it is also important to review these clauses with your counsel as well on a periodic basis.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jeffrey White Jeffrey White

I am a partner at Robinson+Cole who handles corporate compliance and litigation matters for both domestic and international manufacturers and distributors that make and ship products around the world. My clients have ranged from publicly traded Fortune 500 companies to privately held and/or…

I am a partner at Robinson+Cole who handles corporate compliance and litigation matters for both domestic and international manufacturers and distributors that make and ship products around the world. My clients have ranged from publicly traded Fortune 500 companies to privately held and/or family owned manufacturers. For those looking for my detailed law firm bio, click here.

I am often asked why I have focused a large part of my law practice on counseling manufacturers and distributors. As with most things in life, the answer to that question is tied back to experiences I had well before I became a lawyer. My grandfather spent over 30 years working at a steel mill (Detroit Steel Company), including several years in its maintenance department. One of my grandfather’s prime job duties was to make sure that the equipment being used was safe. In his later years, he would apply those lessons learned in every project we did together as he passed on to me his great respect and pride for the manufacturing industry.

Because of these experiences, I not only feel comfortable advising executives in a boardroom, but also can easily transition to the factory floor. My experience has involved a range of industries, including aerospace and defense, chemicals, energy, pharmaceuticals and life sciences, nutritional and dietary supplements, and retail and consumer products. While I have extensive experience in litigation (including product liability and class actions), I am extremely proactive about trying to keep my clients out of the courtroom if at all possible. Specifically, I have counseled manufacturers and distributors on issues such as product labeling and warranties, product recalls, workplace safety/OSHA, anti-trust, and vendor relations, among other things. I always look for the business-friendly solution to a problem that may face a manufacturer or distributor and I hope this blog will help advance those efforts.