Last week, I had the privilege of speaking at ACI’s 2nd Annual Consumer Products Regulation & Litigation Conference in Chicago.  During the conference, I moderated a panel of in-house attorneys that worked at General Electric, Williams-Sonoma, Deere & Co., and Nordstrom.  One of the issues that always comes up at conferences involving litigation is “e-discovery.”  For those of you that have not been involved in litigation lately, e-discovery has placed a significant financial burden on companies.  Basically, it means that if you are sued, it is likely that the other party will ask that you produce electronic documents during the discovery process.  It is not uncommon for manufacturers to have to hire outside vendors to search their e-mail archives for documents that might relate to the lawsuit.  This can cost tens of thousands of dollars.

What can you do?

The simplest way to minimize expense is to ensure that you have a document retention policy in place that establishes when certain documents will be destroyed in the ordinary course of business.  Once a lawsuit is filed (and possibly, before), there are obligations that are imposed that require that a company keep documents.  Therefore, the time to consider creating or updating your document retention policy is when the seas are calm.   We have worked with several manufacturers in updating their policies in the past year and understand that document retention policies need to take into account various certification standards (such as ISO) that might apply.  In addition, the retention policies for certain documents are set by state law so it is important to conduct a legal review on a periodic basis.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jeffrey White Jeffrey White

I am a partner at Robinson+Cole who handles corporate compliance and litigation matters for both domestic and international manufacturers and distributors that make and ship products around the world. My clients have ranged from publicly traded Fortune 500 companies to privately held and/or…

I am a partner at Robinson+Cole who handles corporate compliance and litigation matters for both domestic and international manufacturers and distributors that make and ship products around the world. My clients have ranged from publicly traded Fortune 500 companies to privately held and/or family owned manufacturers. For those looking for my detailed law firm bio, click here.

I am often asked why I have focused a large part of my law practice on counseling manufacturers and distributors. As with most things in life, the answer to that question is tied back to experiences I had well before I became a lawyer. My grandfather spent over 30 years working at a steel mill (Detroit Steel Company), including several years in its maintenance department. One of my grandfather’s prime job duties was to make sure that the equipment being used was safe. In his later years, he would apply those lessons learned in every project we did together as he passed on to me his great respect and pride for the manufacturing industry.

Because of these experiences, I not only feel comfortable advising executives in a boardroom, but also can easily transition to the factory floor. My experience has involved a range of industries, including aerospace and defense, chemicals, energy, pharmaceuticals and life sciences, nutritional and dietary supplements, and retail and consumer products. While I have extensive experience in litigation (including product liability and class actions), I am extremely proactive about trying to keep my clients out of the courtroom if at all possible. Specifically, I have counseled manufacturers and distributors on issues such as product labeling and warranties, product recalls, workplace safety/OSHA, anti-trust, and vendor relations, among other things. I always look for the business-friendly solution to a problem that may face a manufacturer or distributor and I hope this blog will help advance those efforts.